The Case for High Glass Options on Speedgates/Speedlanes(swing barrier optical turnstiles)

We at Orion Entrance Control are often asked about the various glass heights offered on our speedgate optical turnstiles (Orion’s OBSG, OBSG-TL, OBSG-H). The following is a discussion of that topic, with a focus on the reasons that a client would choose the highest glass option.

Background:

Orion offers an infinite number of glass barrier heights between 38.5’ and 72”.

Drawing showing different highglass heights for tunstiles. High glass speedgates

Lower glass heights tend to present a more welcoming and open appearance – and are therefore the first consideration by many architects and others who might be driven by aesthetics.

High glass choices are often selected for security-related reasons.

So Why Select High Glass?

Here are some of the primary reasons for selecting higher glass in your design:

  • High glass speedgates discourage climb-over attempts in 2 ways. The high glass (especially 72”) is nearly impossible to step or climb over and the cantilever-shaped design brings the glass barrier directly over the pedestal top for added security.
  • High glass speedgates present a more secure appearance to would-be perpetrators. Generally, the appearance of high glass is obvious – yet being transparent glass, it detracts very little from the overall attractiveness and open feeling of the entry way.
Image of two highlass turnstiles with white tops. High glass speedgates

Some federal industry-specific regulations have specified 72” glass as the minimum required for swing glass speedgates for these reasons as well.

—————–

Overhead and front view of a turnstile drawing. High glass speedgates

Conclusion:

Of course, all lobbies with speedgates need to be staffed; speedgates are not recommended for an unstaffed lobby. But it is true that high glass offers higher security, protection against climb-overs, and is a greater deterrent to would-be perpetrators – so it is no surprise that security specifiers concerned with such issues would be more likely to specify the higher glass choices.

We encourage questions and comments on our articles.

Mike McGovern
[email protected]

610-585-7279